18. St. Paul, Minnesota
Compared to our previous listings, you might think the $232,646 median list price of St. Paul isn’t all that bad. But seniors should look beyond just that when they decide on where to settle down. For example, when it comes to livability, this destination scored a 64, which is hardly ideal for a majority of retirees.
A lot of people argue that St. Paul shouldn’t be cast aside- after all, it sounds like a good alternative to Minneapolis, right? Well, we’re here to remind you that not only will you spend a lot more money here than in other places, you’ll also have to pay taxes on your Social Security. Still think it’s a good option?
You won’t long for this next location…..
1 thought on “Avoid These 20 Cities If You Want a Worry-Free Retirement”
I can tell you first hand,Don’t move to Calif!!! I lived in Calif most of my life and in a couple months am going to retire and get out of Calif..too expensive,everything is taxed and housing prices are terrible.