Change #3 Full Retirement Age Reaches 67 for Those Born in 1960 or Later
What Changed
One of the most structurally significant Social Security changes of 2026 is the finalization of the full retirement age (FRA) at 67 for individuals born in 1960 or later. Full retirement age is the age at which a Social Security beneficiary is entitled to 100% of their calculated retirement benefit — neither reduced for early claiming nor eligible for delayed retirement credits.
The gradual increase of the FRA from 65 to 67 was originally enacted in the Social Security Amendments of 1983, phased in over four decades, and 2026 represents the completion of that transition.
By November 2026, the FRA will officially reach 67 for those born in 1960, marking the end of the scheduled phase-in. For anyone born in 1960 or later — which includes every worker currently under age 66 — the full retirement age is now definitively 67. This is described by Social Security policy analysts as a landmark milestone: the program’s new normal.
The gradual phase-in is complete, and there are currently no legislatively scheduled future increases to the FRA beyond 67, though policy debates about further increases continue in the context of Social Security’s long-term financial sustainability.
Key Insight: Workers born in 1960 or later face a 30% permanent benefit reduction if they claim at 62, and can earn a 24% permanent benefit increase by waiting until 70. The difference between claiming at 62 versus 70 — on a $2,000/month full benefit — is roughly $1,080 per month, or $12,960 per year, for life.
What about the money that the government borrow from Social Security, that never got paid back?
Always Honored: Every single time Social Security has needed to “cash in” those bonds to pay benefits, the Treasury has paid them in full. The government has never defaulted on these payments. This is a myth or conspiracy theory that the loans have not been paid back.
As citizens we must plan ahead. Hells bells! Ive been working since a teenager, went to college nights. I have basically worked my ass off my entire life. Even thru losing 2 houses during my divorce at age 37 and starting all over again financially, I still managed to help my 2 kids become very independent with one getting her PhD paid off at age 33 w all her scholarships etc, and the other serving the military then bachelor’s degree. Both very successful buying homes by age 30 or before. Then I retired from my state job at 55 collecting that pension, creating code approved basement apartment, other rentals I have created and back to work full time at age 60 for non state work to make extra money for big house projects and travel. Try to stay healthy w exercise and eating right most of the time. Now I intend to work full time til age 67 at least. Im single and loving it. I make close to $100,000 a year with all my different sources of income I created. My 60s are now for full time work w lots of vacations/travel plans and big house projects. I dont plan on collecting soc sec til I’m age 70 for maximum payout. Might work part time then.
Not true, the government did not put that money back,
That’s a great question!! I know that the left used our SS money to fund the impeachment process against President Trump the first time around. That money is ours and it needs to be repaid!
The democrats would fail at everything they do if they didn’t have access to other people’s money 24/7.
The Democrats what planet are u on?
I believe the government started robbing the Social Security fund shortly after it was established (promising it would never be used for ID and would be invested to grow to a hefty retirement fund–yeah right). At some point deposits and payout became mere budget line items, without any investment, funded by current workers. We regular folks go to jail for running such a ponzi scheme.
How do I access my SS account when on line PC required not Mac. Stupid
That definitely isn’t true! Unless you can show proof please refrain from spreading such statements.
Just where do you think all the money is coming from that Trump has been throwing around instead of taking care of our needs?
Reagan, who was a Republican was the first to take SS for other things
Reagan, who was a Republican was the first to take SS for other things
Replying of comment of 2021 ! Have said it for many years, ever since I read the article about democrats taking money out of S. S.. I have said that if the SS people had the other 2/3rds of their SS monies that they and their employers payed in for 50 years what that would do to the economy! Back then the average SS was $1200 a month should have been $3600 a month. I watched my mother struggle with her SS money just to pay her prescriptions!